We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks. 

More Paul Beatles Autographs?

This set of clipped autographs comes with a real Paul signed item. The seller states these are genuine Beatles autographs.

To me the Ringo looks good, but the George and John dont. Now, the John looks very like the way Paul signs it, but not so much the George.

So what are your views? Ringo original, John and George signed by Paul? Or is the George an Aspinall?

I've attached two other sets by Paul, notice the John is very similiar..but not the George.

Views: 749

Attachments: No photo uploads here

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Beatleworld on March 12, 2013 at 2:36pm

Hi, the Ringo is fine, the George & John are not...maybe neil's ???

Permalink Reply by Lewis Reynolds on March 12, 2013 at 2:55pm

Thanks. I really think the John is by Paul.

Permalink Reply by Beatleworld on March 12, 2013 at 2:56pm

could well be.

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on March 12, 2013 at 3:20pm

To me to appears to be an authentic Ringo, a George by Aspinall, and a John by Paul.

Permalink Reply by Lewis Reynolds on March 12, 2013 at 3:43pm

Thanks Ballroom, my thoughts exactly.

Permalink Reply by Lewis Reynolds on April 20, 2013 at 8:31am

Well I managed to buy this lot from an auction.

The main reason I bought them was for the attached signed photo of Macca.

I got them quite cheap. Hope you like it!

Attachments: No photo uploads here
Permalink Reply by Vestland on April 20, 2013 at 9:20am

That`s a very nice photo/signature!! well done/found:)

Permalink Reply by Lewis Reynolds on April 20, 2013 at 9:21am

Thank you!

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on April 20, 2013 at 11:00am

Nice one. I like it.

Permalink Reply by KarlKeaton on April 20, 2013 at 12:11pm

1st picture (cut signatures) Ringo is genuine and George and John are by Aspinall.

2nd picture, all four done by Paul

3rd picture, all four done by Paul

Last picture, solo Paul, great!

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on April 20, 2013 at 12:21pm

Are you sure that the John was done by Aspinall? It looks like Paul's writing to me.

Permalink Reply by KarlKeaton on April 20, 2013 at 12:28pm

Well, the top of the 'J' spears the top of the 'h', which is typical of Aspinall's JL signature. The 'L' isn't so typical of Aspinall but appears it might been done in a tight area. Also there is no doubt that Aspinall did the George, they all appear to be from the same 'set' so Neil was apparently there at the time. Doesn't look like a Paul version of John to me.

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Groups

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service