We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

This set of clipped autographs comes with a real Paul signed item. The seller states these are genuine Beatles autographs.

To me the Ringo looks good, but the George and John dont. Now, the John looks very like the way Paul signs it, but not so much the George.

So what are your views? Ringo original, John and George signed by Paul? Or is the George an Aspinall?

I've attached two other sets by Paul, notice the John is very similiar..but not the George.

Views: 798

Attachments: No photo uploads here

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Hi, the Ringo is fine, the George & John are not...maybe neil's ???

Thanks. I really think the John is by Paul.

could well be.

To me to appears to be an authentic Ringo, a George by Aspinall, and a John by Paul.

Thanks Ballroom, my thoughts exactly.

Well I managed to buy this lot from an auction.

The main reason I bought them was for the attached signed photo of Macca.

I got them quite cheap. Hope you like it!

Attachments: No photo uploads here

That`s a very nice photo/signature!! well done/found:)

Thank you!

Nice one. I like it.

1st picture (cut signatures) Ringo is genuine and George and John are by Aspinall.

2nd picture, all four done by Paul

3rd picture, all four done by Paul

Last picture, solo Paul, great!

Are you sure that the John was done by Aspinall? It looks like Paul's writing to me.

Well, the top of the 'J' spears the top of the 'h', which is typical of Aspinall's JL signature. The 'L' isn't so typical of Aspinall but appears it might been done in a tight area. Also there is no doubt that Aspinall did the George, they all appear to be from the same 'set' so Neil was apparently there at the time. Doesn't look like a Paul version of John to me.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service