Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on August 24, 2015 at 4:38pm

Cox is usually reliable with beatles items. Not the best looking McCartney signature out there, but does have some positives.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Gene Bausinger on August 24, 2015 at 4:39pm

Thanks

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on August 24, 2015 at 6:33pm

I think it's likely good, too. Parlophone covers had a much thicker coating on the front than Columbia album covers, so you had to press a lot harder to sign them. That's probably why it the autograph doesn't flow as smoothly as other McCartneys.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Gene Bausinger on August 25, 2015 at 2:47am

Thanks

• ▶ Reply