Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Josh Board on December 6, 2011 at 10:10pm

The Lennon looks good. The others don't.

 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Stephen Duncan on January 29, 2012 at 2:56pm

What was John attempting to draw? 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on December 7, 2011 at 3:52am

I agree on the Lennon, and McCartney, but I think the Harrison looks good.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by roger epperson on December 7, 2011 at 11:56am

All three of these are awful in my opinion.  Harrison is a somewhat decent attempt but the others 2 are awful.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on December 7, 2011 at 1:23pm

well, that's why I don't authenticate things for a living!  LOL

Lennon's later in life signatures are difficult for me, they were so inconsistent.  But I thought the harrison had a chance.

the mccartney agreeably is brutal.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Darren Ruskin, III on December 7, 2011 at 4:37pm

horrible! let me guess, you came across these in Las Vegas?? D

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on December 7, 2011 at 10:28pm

Autographs from Vegas.... Should stay in Vegas.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Stephen Duncan on January 29, 2012 at 2:55pm

More SINS from Sin City.............

 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by mark peterson on December 7, 2011 at 10:11pm

I dont like any of these.Sorry!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Greig on December 26, 2011 at 6:27am

I think the George is a good attempt but it's not authentic, the start of the John is close but the rest isn't correct. The McCartney is a terrible forgery.

 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by joeyabuki on January 30, 2012 at 1:38am

Hi, I think all 3 autograph is FAKE.

 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by EjsWurhl on February 6, 2012 at 11:46pm

Why are bogus Beatles autographs some of the funniest signatures that Ive ever seen?  98% of the time I can tell they are bogus without even putting on my glasses!

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page