Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on September 7, 2012 at 4:09am

interesting signature.  I find it hard to believe that the "forger" (if this indeed were a forgery), would have the details of Paul down so well, and screw up with the Mc.  having said that, I think this is one of those "difficult to authenticate" items where it could be a rush job, or signed while he was in the car, thru the window, holding the end of the pen.  the only thing that concerns me is that if this were a rush signature, he probably would have made the P and a in one fluent motion, not separated.  so my opinion is, I just don't know!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on September 7, 2012 at 6:02am

I like it.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on September 7, 2012 at 6:02am

I like it.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on September 7, 2012 at 6:52am

as a signature, I don't like it at all.  that is not an authenticity statement, I just would not want to own it.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on September 7, 2012 at 7:30am

I know what you mean. It's rushed.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by roger epperson on September 7, 2012 at 7:20am

Gary, rest easy now, I too believe it is authentic

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Gary Harvey on September 7, 2012 at 9:05am

Thanks guys

I must state right now as Roger knows, I know my Beatles stuff, but still occasionally I find myself questioning Autographs from McCartney. I get offered plenty of the Paul signatures , and I only pay £40  or $60 for these as they are not easy to sell

I know Roger doesnt like them either but as I have stated previously Macca is hard work unless you get him low key. so I do buy in some of the rushed ones,

Hence I bought this item 4 years ago, its been tucked away in my collection. But someone questioned it recently so I thought I would throw it out here

Its going away again Ha ha   into my Collection

Im going to put on here a Macca I got myself in London last year and see what you think

It is very interesting

Cheers

Gary

• ▶ Reply