Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on June 22, 2013 at 7:47am

could be real, but signature in photo is small and not very clear

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on June 22, 2013 at 9:01am

That looks ok to me. A rushed signature.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on June 22, 2013 at 10:14am

It appears to have been slowly drawn, and the "au" doesn't look right to me. I'd also like to see a better pic, though.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by dexter krieger on June 22, 2013 at 5:46pm

IMO, I don't think it's legit

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Helen on June 23, 2013 at 12:13pm

I have said that this autograph was received in 2007 in London , in office MPL.то say?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on June 23, 2013 at 3:40pm

Thanks. In getting a better look at it, I'm leaning towards authentic.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Suso Vilar on June 30, 2013 at 11:52am

Any one of you can tell me if these autographs are good ones?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Suso Vilar on June 30, 2013 at 11:53am

This is the other:

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Suso Vilar on June 30, 2013 at 11:53am

Thanks to all of you

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on June 30, 2013 at 11:57am

Neither the Paul nor the Ringo looks authentic to me. Both are pretty bad, actually.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Suso Vilar on June 30, 2013 at 12:29pm

I thought the same....

Kind regards

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on June 30, 2013 at 12:30pm

ditto

• ▶ Reply