Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on September 13, 2014 at 2:40pm

authentic

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on September 13, 2014 at 2:45pm

Yes, I agree. I think it's authentic.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by heath emery on September 13, 2014 at 2:55pm

That is what I was thinking! If I could buy it I would but no cash at the moment.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on September 13, 2014 at 3:08pm

Little older sig but that big spot ruins it, hence the cheaper price.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by heath emery on September 13, 2014 at 3:16pm

Yeah the spot kinda is a shame. But for 250 id take it

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on September 13, 2014 at 3:18pm

Ya, nicer price than the $900 I paid for mine. $250 for an authentic PM cut would be a really good deal.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by heath emery on September 13, 2014 at 3:30pm

True id still love to have it but for now my autograph collection is where it needs to be. I need to be happy for what I have in front of me. It's up for grabs if someone wants it though!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by heath emery on September 13, 2014 at 3:31pm

I wish this was still on the full page it was on though...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on September 13, 2014 at 3:35pm

I agree with that. I'd love to have any kind of autograph of the celebs that I really admire, Paul being one of them, but simple cuts are not as exciting. And not that mine is super exciting or anything, here's a pic of mine.

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• image.jpg, 1 MB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on September 13, 2014 at 3:50pm

I'd get it too if money wasn't tight this month.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by heath emery on September 13, 2014 at 3:55pm

This is an awesome paul mccartney love it!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on September 13, 2014 at 4:01pm

Thanks. I think it has nice "character" to it, being that it was signed in the early '70s. Hey, do you have the item # for that cut? I'd like to read the description.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page