We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Peter O'Toole and Clint Eastwood from reputable dealer. Little suspicious though

Hi me again posting yet more pictures of my increasingly depressed looking autograph collection. I bough both these Clint Eastwood and Peter O'Toole autographs from the same dealer a few years back. They both come with signing details and were supposedly signed in 2007. Looking at them again I think they both look a little suspicious. The Peter O'Toole is more of a flamboyant signature than I have seen in other examples (look at the curvy 'P' and 'T'). The Eastwood is a great example if it is genuine but it just looks too clean.

I would probably say they weren't real if it wasn't for the dealer's great reputation. Even other dealers and authenticators on this site speak very highly of them. I'd be interested in what others have to say.

Eastwood.JPG

O%27Toole.JPG

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Tim Male on August 27, 2013 at 12:47pm

Hey has anyone got an opinion on either/both of these? I'd appreciate any thoughts. Cheers

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by KatoTheMaster on August 27, 2013 at 1:08pm

On the Eastwood you should check this out: http://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/clint-eastwood-signa....

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Tim Male on August 27, 2013 at 1:48pm

Thanks a lot for that. It only seems to confirm my worries though. None of the examples posted look like mine. Like I say though it is a worry because I purchased them from a reputable dealer.