Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on July 13, 2017 at 9:56am

That's disturbing.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on July 13, 2017 at 10:14am

Theres a dealer in the uk called
Mr sloane, registered uacc. He doesnt have anything in store at the moment.
Most of us know that photo proof is garbage, Dealers using the same old photos to sell over and over again. In the case of autos99 ,stealing photos that crap isnt on. Were the Stones sets fake?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Patrick1977 on July 14, 2017 at 2:44am

My question is. Does it make autographs99 a bad dealer in order of selling fakes or is he using other peoples photos to make his legit items "proofen" to get a higher price?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on July 14, 2017 at 3:12am

No fakes.
Picture proof is garbage full stop. How many dealers use the same photos over and over again that proves nothing.
It comes down to whats signed, not filmed.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rick Meyer on July 14, 2017 at 6:41am

Stealing other people's proof photo's and passing them off as your own is dirty. It demonstrates your integrity level to me. No different then claiming a bought signature was obtained in person. Lying is lying. I Don't know if this dealer does this but if I knew for sure they did they would be scratched off my list.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on July 14, 2017 at 7:03am

I'm with you, Rick. Collector members here that know their stuff have nothing but praise for them, but what Justin Steffman said really concerns me.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on July 14, 2017 at 7:22am

I dont condone this behavior, point out the forgeries it may be better.
I dont condone collectors marrying items together to boost the provenance, eg like a daybill from a gig, that matches the autograph! Vip graphs use the same generic photo, for every signed item thats related, its all hog wash.
Now you can choose to buy from either vip or auto99, so what will the collector choose to do, base it on photo's or the signatures , base it off a beckett coa, psa.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on July 14, 2017 at 7:45am

List the forgeries from auto99, im not American and i dont know the sports! Lets list them and say this seller is a forger or legit.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on July 11, 2017 at 10:04pm

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Pearl-Jam-RARE-Signed-Concert-Poster-Eddie-...

raretracks

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on July 11, 2017 at 10:05pm

http://www.ebay.com/itm/MUDHONEY-ON-TOP-TOUR-POSTER-SIGNED-BY-THE-B...

rockshopngavel

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Cogo on October 25, 2018 at 8:31pm

Any proof for this claim Tim? 

I’m not saying you’re wrong, but I feel that it must take a bit more than just one member simply saying something to make it an absolute truth!

I have bought 100% genuine items from Rockshopgavel, but if they mixes good stuff with bad ones it’s good that you bring that to the members attention.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Cogo on October 26, 2018 at 8:24am

No problem at all Tim, that doesn’t sound good at all! And I’m sure you were correct in these cases.

But I stand by my opinion that it’s crucial that we present all proof we have when saying that a seller isn’t trustworthy.

Because if we only say stuff without backing it up with solid proof, AML becomes more of a slander/gossip site than a site based on knowledge. And that would be unfortunate!

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• …
• 16
• Next ›
• Page