Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by roger epperson on September 7, 2011 at 8:13am

As you can see from above his signature changes quite a bit.  Here are some more images.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eddie Anderson on September 7, 2011 at 9:31am

Dear Roger!

Welcome back :)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on September 7, 2011 at 10:46am

Roger,

thanks for posting this. My head was spinning trying to figure out which end was up with that previous thread on Elvis.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by roger epperson on September 7, 2011 at 11:16am

Thanks for the kind words, I have to agree with you on that it does go all over the place.  Here some more images.I said in the other posting about people watch my every move, it's creepy and to prove what I'm saying there is a blog that already posted that I'm back on this site.  Creepy!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Brick Hunter on September 7, 2011 at 12:08pm

Good to see you back. I hope cooler heads have prevailed.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on September 7, 2011 at 8:53pm

Greg,

You're trying to cause dissent here. Brick and Roger get along very well. There's no competition going on. 

Stop wasting everyone's time and energy. Either act like a responsible and ethical member of this site or leave. If you're goal is to push me until I suspend you, think seriously about it. Because I've warned you enough that I won't suspend you if it gets that far—I'll remove you from the site and never allow you back.

Which would be a shame, because in the past you've been a meaningful member of this site, and I hold hope that could happen again.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Brick Hunter on September 8, 2011 at 1:52am

Greg, why do you keep calling me a young person? It's not as though I'm a teenager. I've been collecting for over a decade. That's not much compared to some collectors but I consider myself a fairly fast learner. I'm trying at least. I want the truth. I'd be surprised if you were more than twenty years my senior.

 

I think Greg has done way too much for this site and the autograph hobby as a whole (Jimi Hendrix study was brilliant) to be cast off. It often sounds like he has more against Roger than he's shown. Is there more evidence to that? I think there could be some credence to these downward sloping "P's," I don't think it's a conspiracy though. It can be frustrating when someone won't reveal their "tells" or the reason they feel this or way that. But it is Roger's prerogative. He has given a lot of free authentication on this site.

 

Truths if they are there will come out. Whether it is on this site or not. I don't think the antagonistic attitudes helped from the beginning.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by roger epperson on September 8, 2011 at 6:15am

Brick, you are correct that "P" is a very good sign of Bakker forgeries.  It's VERY telling, the problem is that Elvis did do it now and then too jsut like he did on the one on the other blog.  Hans had to have seen it somewhere to have used that as his template.  The thing that everyone needs to understand though is you can't just focus on ONE letter in a signature to say that it's not authentic.  Hans made many other errors consistantly and when you put them ALL together you find a Hans forgery.  For some reason and I believe it comes from a joke I made on a blog he started about how hot some girl was.  After my comment he made a very knife cutting comment back and within 2 days he became an Elvis expert and started his posted to try to discredit me.  That's just my guess.  He said that in a year he would come back and post some great Elvis study but it would take many more years then that to understand Elvis's signature, handwriting and all of his other people that signed for him.  Then he would have to study and point out all of the forgers from over the last 50 years that did Elvis.  It just doesn't work like that.  I have studied Elvis with many other very good people who are experts on Elvis for over 20 years.  I still don't know everything there is to know and learn something new all the time.

Permalink Reply by roger epperson on September 7, 2011 at 5:51pm

Nice to see the Thespians are here to shed such intelligencia on the site.  You really showed me!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on September 7, 2011 at 7:48pm

Greg,

I think you need to stop using this site until you can act sanely and responsibly. I don't know if you actually drink as much as you say you do, or what's going on. But you've turned from a valuable and responsible member of this site into a joke. Act decently and responsibly, or leave if you don't want to. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on September 7, 2011 at 8:03pm

Amen

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by DB on September 8, 2011 at 5:22am

ah ha, now I see what the squabble entails.  Funny part about 21st century blogging is one can't always see the "humour" or "intent" in a simple blogged entry and interpretations can run the gamut.  Sort of like VanDerHoven's sense of humor and play lol.

 

nonetheless, oh owner of AMLive, these types of posts should be done offline and not in public.  if a violation of posting rules has been done -vs- a brewing fight (u created a thread for Friday Night Fights as I recall and they can do it there)... but if a violation occurred then the post get's removed. 

 

It would be nice to see bantering and touche/parry subside but as I have seen it's ok to a point and provides character insights.  When taken too far (and it must be consistent regardless of poster) then some offline interactions ought to occur not public displays directed at anyone person.

 

Perhaps a reminder of the code of conduct on threads when the bantering goes to far is warranted as a message to everyone which would be a good public posting from a moderator and also a fair warning that some private discussions may be next..

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• …
• 13
• Next ›
• Page