Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Lewis Reynolds on October 28, 2014 at 1:46am

I would say not real.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by wascher on October 28, 2014 at 2:41am

Do you have a close up of just the signature?  It looks like its almost printed or something because it has a pixelated look to it vs the actual picture

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by wascher on October 28, 2014 at 8:38am

What it looks like to me is that its a print of a photo and someone layered a Ringo on top of it - but made that one larger - and it pixelated when they made it larger.  Interesting lol

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on October 28, 2014 at 6:57am

Nope....

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Antonio on October 28, 2014 at 8:34am

Fake, ringo signed only ringo...and he finish to sign starr al 1996 !!!
the R letter if very be different of the real signature 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on October 28, 2014 at 9:22am

The signed photo is Not real at all!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by dexter krieger on October 28, 2014 at 9:54am

IMO, the Ringo is not real. The pen used, looks like one of those black paint pens. It's either that or someone tried capturing the so-called signature with photoshop and had it printed on the photo. It looks similar to those cheap pre-print signatures you always see on ebay, that never look like the real thing, selling for less than 10 bucks.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by wascher on October 28, 2014 at 10:06am

Yep that's what I thought too (above)... the pixels on the auto don't match the pixels on the photo :) idiots.

• ▶ Reply