We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Really?

How can this item be authenticated with any certainty? At what point does this pass the test? 51% certain it resembles some exemplars?

http://www.ebay.com/itm/John-Lennon-Paul-McCartney-Signed-3x4-Cut-M...

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by george enrique on August 30, 2017 at 5:12pm

they look fine to me though

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by spaceman on August 30, 2017 at 5:23pm

Not the best examples, but authenticated as original by Frank.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on August 30, 2017 at 5:34pm

There autographs are authentic, more than 51 percent!

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on August 30, 2017 at 5:54pm

These are fine...I've seen these before...and...Frank says they're OK!!! Good enough for me!

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Thomas William on August 30, 2017 at 8:05pm

I guess thats what makes this industry difficult for many to agree on whats authentic. The McCartney looks right and the Lennon is a crap shoot to me.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bruce Juice on August 30, 2017 at 8:07pm

Since Frank has literally 1000s of exemplars -- I would imagine he's seen this rushed style of Lennon before. I wouldn't pay a ton for it though.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on August 30, 2017 at 8:55pm

Its not really that rushed, thats how he signed. It matches other examplars.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by KarlKeaton on August 31, 2017 at 12:24am

They look like scrappy but authentic 1963 autographs to me too.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on August 31, 2017 at 4:31am

These are fine. You know...every time they sign...it isn't always on a flat,hard surface. Was Lennon holding it with his hand?...was the person he was signing for,holding the paper for him?..were they signing on the run?