Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on January 1, 2017 at 6:36pm

Authenticity aside,the middle one seems a glossy 8x10 color photo - what about 1 and 3?

ADDED - of the ones posted by Cameron, not Samuel.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Cameron Thom on January 1, 2017 at 6:39pm

I think number 1 may be real and number three. It's hard to choose.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on January 1, 2017 at 6:45pm

Well, there are opinions about those 3 you posted Cameron. I asked about what they are because part of the value is in what is signed, so that is part of the choice it seems. A book photo or mag photo or other type of print is worth less to some collectors than a lab quality photograph on good paper. The first one you posted - the b/w that might have a shot at being genuine - seems as odd photo. What is it? A photo or page or?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Cameron Thom on January 1, 2017 at 6:47pm

Yeah it's a photo but my only concern is, I've seen other ones like that on other sites...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on January 1, 2017 at 6:49pm

You are saying the first one you posted, the horizontal b/w, is a lab quality chemical print?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Cameron Thom on January 1, 2017 at 6:53pm

That's what I'm saying, I don't exactly know. The website IOffer stated that it's a genuine signature. This is were I have been getting all of my signatures from which I have posted in this.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Pete Bendu on January 1, 2017 at 6:57pm

You are here now.....you have access to real information about real autographs. Do yourself a huge favor and avoid IOffer like the plague.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Cameron Thom on January 1, 2017 at 7:02pm

The only reason I was looking on Ioffer is due to the low pricing of the autographs which do look some what genuine. I'm not a professional collector and I've always wanted a De Niro signsture on my wall and i don't really want to go paying too much money for it, you know?

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on January 1, 2017 at 7:02pm

Agree with Pete again, strongly!

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on January 1, 2017 at 7:00pm

Well, as they are apparently not very genuine I suppose it doesn't matter, but I don't pay full price for signed book pages, magazine pages and other things unless they have some other quality that is exceptional. Others also do not. I am not talking about signatures, but the nature of the print. What Samuel posted really makes this moot apart from the basic point of cheaper types of "photographs" being sold at full lab photo value. For example, there is a computer printed Bowie signed photo (PSA/DNA) for $1200 - seller does not mention it is a computer print so thin you can likely see through it and so speckled and degraded/pixelated. I would not sell it under any circumstances at any price. Yet it is offered as a "photo". What is the reputation of IOffer again?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Samuel John Clifford on January 1, 2017 at 7:06pm

The reputation of IOffer is horrible, pretty much everything I've seen is fake.

Permalink Reply by Cameron Thom on January 1, 2017 at 7:07pm

So, eBay is my only option. I feel like eBay sellers sell their signatures for far too much than they should. I think a reasonable price for a De Niro signature is round the price of £60-80

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• Next ›
• Page