Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on October 22, 2012 at 9:45am

It's not the traditional Tiger Woods autograph authenticators are used to seeing...or most of us are for that matter, so I wouldn't send it to PSA/DNA even if a lot of people here liked it. They told you what they're most likely to call it.

Post a comment on David Wright's profile with a link, asking for his input. He won't be online much for the next couple of weeks, but he's great on modern golf.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mark Roberts on October 22, 2012 at 10:35am

Will do - thanks for your suggestion.

Mark

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bob Zafian on January 31, 2013 at 11:14am

Mark, in my opinion the signature is not real.  While displaying some of the characteristics of a real signature there are many things going on with it that tell me no good.  I have several exemplars of his mail in signatures as well and it doesn't even fit those too much.  Remember that someone who is forging or ghost signing for another, it's their "job" to make the signature appear to be that of the individual.  In this case although they capture a couple things, there's way more wrong going on here.  Also one doesn't need to go much further that the To Mark personalizations although there are times where that is written by another individual as in the case of Arnold Palmer whose personalizations are almost always done by office personnel. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mark Roberts on January 31, 2013 at 11:22am

Thanks for taking a look at it..

Mark

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page