We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

What do folks think of this "Harrison Ford"

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Robert Sledz on August 29, 2015 at 12:56pm

I like that it is in full view...Obviously not the MOST area to work with in signing this, although seems good to me in the key strokes... WSY?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rich on August 29, 2015 at 1:50pm

I would think it'd be just about impossible to make a call on something that sloppy. Other than a vague semblance of an H, you really have nothing there. Personally, I just don't want autographs that look like that unless I got it myself and it has some sort of sentimental value.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Robert Sledz on August 29, 2015 at 2:07pm

I don't think it is sloppy at all. He wanted to write it on a visible area and that was the only spot. It was verified....It is good enough for Star Wars....it's good enough for me. I am just sharing it around to see what people think...Thanks for your opinion, but today's actors write sloppy. We are not in the 1940's anymore. I was actually lucky enough to get it on a Star wars photo. He was in Chicago going through a hotel, my reliable and very notably recognizable source whose friends extend here on this page, tells me;-)

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Robert Sledz on August 29, 2015 at 2:13pm

I have another....

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rich on August 29, 2015 at 2:15pm

Definitely more to work with there! I'm not one of the better forum experts on Ford, but - if authentic - that's decidedy more of in ideal example.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Robert Sledz on August 29, 2015 at 2:21pm

Thank you. On the Star Wars, you always take what you can get! Those are always keepers. If the other was a regular photo, I agree...it would be sad... haha....But as you can see on this one, there was more room to work with regards the signature based on the color contrast of the felt than it was on the one from "Han Solo's:

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Robert Sledz on August 29, 2015 at 2:38pm

How does this one strike y'all?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mike Shepherd on August 29, 2015 at 3:30pm

The Han Solo autograph is mostly atypical of Harrison Ford's in-person autographs, although it does contain one particular typical trait. The Indiana Jones autograph is typical of Harrison Ford's in-person autographs. I agree with Rich's initial assessment. I will not comment on the second Indiana Jones autograph regardless of what I may feel about it. No need to test members here Robert. All the best.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Robert Sledz on August 29, 2015 at 4:13pm

Well, this is the place you should comment, Mike. Btw, every one of these was an in-person sign, based on the seller I have known to only sell in person autographs. The only thing I am uncertain about are the dates these were signed. Seems like the lengthier one in the 2nd was the oldest.. ;-)

All The Best to you too.. :)

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mike Shepherd on August 29, 2015 at 4:36pm

I agree about the dates Robert. That information would be very helpful, particularly regarding the second Indiana Jones autograph. It still concerns me a little bit.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Robert Sledz on August 29, 2015 at 4:54pm

From the exemplars I looked at, Mike, Ford would write the longer way in the 90's.. He then constricted his letters in the 2000's and mid... That 2nd one looks to me like one of the 90's.. I see a bit of a similarity with the others with regard to the "F", "H" and "D's" (The 2 or 3 hoops under)

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rich on August 29, 2015 at 5:39pm

I bought this one from Autograph World 15 years ago. A little bit more fleshed out than most of what I see offered to day (Official Pix signings aside).