We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks.

What do you guys think?

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on May 29, 2018 at 11:08am

YES?...or NO?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by george enrique on May 29, 2018 at 2:02pm

Looks new to me Jim but thats just my opinion,lets see what the others think.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by spaceman on May 29, 2018 at 2:20pm

I see this has recently been sold via a well known Beatles autograph site. I would have expected a letter of provenance or document from the original recipient stating when and where this album was signed.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on May 29, 2018 at 2:51pm

Tough one Jim,it has some good qualities,consistent with a lennon sig..at the same time it looks a little off.to answer your question , Imo...I say good.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Invest_In_Graphs on May 29, 2018 at 4:55pm

More likely than not - No. J is misformed, o and L are slowly-done, e is too small, the first n is too-carefully formed, and it hooks left at the end.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by fab432 on May 29, 2018 at 5:10pm

Hmmmm don’t like this one looks manufactured to me.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on May 30, 2018 at 5:01am

The Lennon drawing is consistent with the So. Cal. forgers...also...look at the hump in the first letter "n" in Lennon....consistent with the forgers as well....don't like it...

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on May 30, 2018 at 7:39am

I noticed the same things and think that's a good possibility.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on May 30, 2018 at 5:03am

Compare...

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by 1-2-3-FAW on May 30, 2018 at 8:36am

I have less than 15 1977 examplars in me files. this item sold at auction in 2013 for 17k without an LOA . Most examples are personal chks and documents. Hope I uploaded ok

Attachments: No photo uploads here