Authenticity is Everything
Which McCartney is more desirable?
Hi everyone,
Considering selling one of these 2 Macca autographs that I got myself in London.
Both signatures are on the inside cover- beautiful, full signatures, on McCartney 11 and Venus and Mars LP's. The McCartney 11 one probably means more to me as it was the first time I met the great man and got his signature (80's), although it's faded slightly. I may well still keep them, but wanted to know your thoughts on these signed non Beatle items, and views on their value?
Considering selling one of these 2 Macca autographs that I got myself in London.
Both signatures are on the inside cover- beautiful, full signatures, on McCartney 11 and Venus and Mars LP's. The McCartney 11 one probably means more to me as it was the first time I met the great man and got his signature (80's), although it's faded slightly. I may well still keep them, but wanted to know your thoughts on these signed non Beatle items, and views on their value?
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on
-
The bolder one is probably considerably more valuable.
-
Permalink Reply by KarlKeaton on
-
I like them both although I usually prefer his earlier signatures but the fading does make it lose some of it's impact.
I'd agree with Paul's valuation of $800-1500 .
Sign up for our Newsletter!
Photos
© 2026 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
