Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by James on September 17, 2015 at 9:54pm

I would lean authentic, although the "M" looks a little different to me. See what others say.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on September 18, 2015 at 4:01am

Im leaning the other way.  a couple of inconsistencies.  I would run it by PSA.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on September 18, 2015 at 8:13am

I think the Mays forgeries are starting to pick up, but I was probably wrong last time. Of course similar sigs were shown after I gave my opinion.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Big Bad John on September 21, 2015 at 9:24am

Thank you for your thoughts. I think what I'm getting here from you is a maybe, probably not.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on September 21, 2015 at 10:13am

The swirl above the M bugs me. A PSA quick opinion might help. The only area I trust them at all is with some of the sports hall of famers because the have many good examples to look at. Most of the time when I give an opinion I don't look at other signatures, I just don't have time. Basically I give my own free quick opinions from collecting 35 years, however Im not always up to date sometimes when signatures change.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on September 21, 2015 at 8:00pm

I was concerned about the swirl above the M but initially said lean authentic. Well, I'm reversing my lean. I do now think it's likely not authentic.

• ▶ Reply