We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Worst PINK FLOYD forgery ever authenticated by PSA/DNA

http://www.ebay.com/itm/251767494153?ru=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2...

They've hit an all time low with this one. wow.

3 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Rick Meyer on January 28, 2015 at 8:04pm

Why do you keep writing responses and deleting them without letting somebody reply? I saw one where you say I said Roger was a god. Point that out to me. I'd like to see where I ever said that. I think Roger is way better than PSA. Doesn't mean I agree with him on everything. I've used his QO before but only as a second opinion to my own.

Another where you ask about my credentials. What are yours? What about PSAs credentials? Anybody can write a bio and claim anything they want. Does that equate to credentials? I guess to you it does.

Permalink Reply by Richard on January 28, 2015 at 8:09pm

Rick .....is the above Floyd or bad ?

Permalink Reply by Rick Meyer on January 28, 2015 at 8:17pm

I'm curious what you think of it. What are your opinions on it? Why not start another thread with it rather than high jack this one with it?

Permalink Reply by Richard on January 28, 2015 at 8:40pm

You jut got done telling someone else to take their item down that has an R & R CERT , a PSA cert and a Epperson Cert ... who the heck are you to tell us what is good or bad unless you bought it and was having a problem , so is the one I presented real or fake ..if you don't know you need to shut your mouth and stop telling people what they should do ....so is it good or band know Know it all ?

Permalink Reply by Rick Meyer on January 28, 2015 at 9:32pm

Richard, never told him to take it down. Why not reread it? Was asked about clarification and why Authenticators haven't spoken on it. I mentioned still selling it with this discussion and questions on it. The seller says if he finds out it's bad he would refund no questions asked. He probably would. Seller has done his due diligence and it would suck huge with that much invested. I'm more interested in the links between all the COAs.

Next, I didn't tell you personally a damn thing. I never told you something was good or bad. Wasn't even talking to you. I think this is but that's my opinion. Just like anyone else here I can state my opinion and I will. I am not swayed by stickers and COAs. If you don't like it tough sh1t. Nothing you can do about it. Not like you're going to shut me up.

I've seen some of your other silly tests. The Van Halen post asking if it was good or bad was comical. You know if that album is good or bad.... Figure it out. Send it to PSA. I'm not in the market to buy it. I have an opinion on it though. I asked for yours. I'm all for dialogue. Until then I am not entertaining you.

Permalink Reply by Richard on January 28, 2015 at 11:46pm

You simply stated if he Was " honest " he would take it down ......

If that is not implying to take it down I don't know what is...

The above example of Pink Floyd ..is it authentic in your opinion ?

Permalink Reply by Mike T on January 29, 2015 at 2:57pm

It looks authentic to me.

Permalink Reply by N.Steiger on January 29, 2015 at 3:41pm

Bob, it is not real. Not even close, it is one of the worst forgeries I have ever seen and I cannot believe anyone authenticated it. This is nothing personal, this is just an exposure of PSA/DNA and how bad they really are. Do what you must.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Charles Krejci on January 30, 2015 at 6:49pm

I have gone through my Floyd autographs and all my David Gilmour autographs have the "D" and "a" separated on David part of the signature this one they are joined together, I see when David has rushed his sig around the "on a island tour" there are examples of the D and "a" together without a pen break, being that this is a piece of Floyd with all 4 of them on it , I find it hard to believe David would sign this with the D and "a" without a pen break after 2006 with Roger Waters on it and vica versa being a Floyd item , so it begs the question, this David sig is not pre 1982 as it looks nothing like his signed items from this period, that leaves a window from 1982 till 1986 I do not have a example of his autographs in this window, on too 1986 till 1994 division bell

I have still not seen any autographs from this period where the D and "a" are joined without a pen break, just being logical about this piece David probably would of have to have signed before Roger which I don't think this would of happened after 1994 due to the bad blood between the two and him being a very hard signer on Floyd items , so when was this piece signed? from David , I myself do not know ,anybody have any ideas as to what time period where this David Gilmour sig resembles the one on the auction item, or even have a legit one where it matches that one , to me that David sig looks not legit and does not fit any provenance that I can go back too , just my two-bits

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on January 29, 2015 at 3:17pm

I agree .authentic for sure.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on February 12, 2015 at 11:31pm

If i owned this wall album, the one posted and we're concerned with its authenticity because of the feedback. Where could I get a professional opinion on it about its authenticity?