We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.
Tags:
Andrew, I appreciate your thoughts and it all seems logical except for one thing. If the land grant was re-issued on May 1, 1837 for an 1832 sale, the grant should have been signed by Martin Van Buren's secretary since Jackson's secretary wouldn't have been in that position on that date. The only explanation is that the date the re-issue was in reality signed on March 1, 1837 when Jackson was still in office. The only problem with this is that it is clear the date was May 1.
Any thoughts on this?
From my experience, yes. I own a few that passed JSA.
Posted by CJCollector on November 11, 2024 at 6:03pm 0 Comments 1 Like
Posted by CJCollector on November 9, 2024 at 2:32pm 7 Comments 0 Likes
Posted by CJCollector on October 30, 2024 at 3:13pm 2 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin. Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service