Comment by Elijah John Wilson on July 7, 2012 at 11:57pm

All the cards I posted were TTM. You can tell that the two LT cards are real because:

1. He has a good reputation for personally signing ttm. and

2. The two sigs do differ from one another, which is to be expected when the sigs were written by a real person. I doubt that it's secretarial because he's not popular enough right now for him to justify needing one for signatures. Peyton Manning is one of few players who does need one.

Comment by James Lafaman on July 8, 2012 at 6:59am

Got one in person from LT in Manhattan Del Frisco's late 2011 / early 2012.

Comment by James Lafaman on July 8, 2012 at 7:22am

Scan attached.

Comment by Jeffery Kite on July 14, 2012 at 7:08pm

Guys, I am on the fence. Part of me says LTs that are TTM are no good, but part of me wants to beleive they are. I have an LT that I got TTM, so to put this argument to rest, I'm going to send it to the National Sport Collectors Convention for authentication. Here is a LT that looks similar, to me anyway, to yours Elijah that PSA authenticated. It's on ebay right now, item # 320690320146.

Comment by Jeffery Kite on July 14, 2012 at 7:21pm

I'll probably need it! :)

Comment by Jeffery Kite on July 16, 2012 at 6:40am

In total defense of MIke, pretty much every authentic LT I have ever seem looks like his. The problem I have is that there are suposed authentic versions like the one I posted. Is this a "quick sig" that LT uses? Only one way to find out. I'll be back to this issue sometime after August 5th.

Comment by Jeffery Kite on August 7, 2012 at 12:17pm

OK, here's the verdict: the LT autograph that I recieved in the mail back in January of this year was ceritified as authentic by PSA/DNA. Maybe LT has changed his autograph over the past few years or so. I have posted a Lawrence Taylor autograph discussion for everyone to chime in on and share their thoughts on my LT autograph and others that decide to post their LT autographs.

Comment