Comment by david dodds on February 26, 2012 at 7:19am

Comment by david dodds on February 26, 2012 at 7:24am

Comment by david dodds on February 26, 2012 at 7:26am

Comment by david dodds on February 26, 2012 at 7:27am

Comment by roger epperson on February 26, 2012 at 9:30am

David

I'm sorry but these autographs are not authentic.  What is really odd though is this is not the first time I have seen this same style autograph on this kind of item.  They are aged the same and usually on Hard Days Night pieces like 45's, albums and posters.  It makes me wonder if someone at that time period was doing these long before they had much value.

Comment by david dodds on February 26, 2012 at 5:43pm

Comment by Richard S. Simon on February 26, 2012 at 5:45pm

Not to be nasty but now you are wasting everyone's time here.

The opinions are totally in agreement, you don't have anything of value.

Give it a rest now.

Comment by Rick Meyer on February 26, 2012 at 5:47pm

LOL, that McCartney sig is worse then the first. The dollar your friend spent on those 20 years ago is long gone.

Comment by david dodds on February 26, 2012 at 6:06pm

WOW. thats what we wanted to see if some said... the paul.... the owner got in person. . now how is it possible.?? 

Comment by Richard S. Simon on February 27, 2012 at 4:50am

If I had a dollar for everyone who said "I got it in person" and did not,,, then I could retire to Costa Rica and live in a nice villa near the beach.

Comment

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page