Comment by Josh Board on December 15, 2011 at 4:32pm

It looks good to me. Not the usual looking George signature...but looks good.

Comment by terrier8HOF on December 15, 2011 at 6:26pm

its confusing, the George looks good but the Harrison seems off. I dont think I would buy it.

Comment by MeanMisterMustard on December 16, 2011 at 10:17am

It looks good to me as well. the handwriting is what really stands out as a good example from the period.

Comment by mark peterson on December 16, 2011 at 11:39am

It looks good to me.

Comment by Xperttexpert on December 21, 2011 at 7:03am

Looks like a great George from early 1964.

Comment by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on December 28, 2011 at 10:23am

It's signed a bit fast and loose, but I think it's good. And the ink color and aging is just what I'd expect. It would be great to get a pro's opinion.

Comment by Alexander Mehl on February 11, 2015 at 9:21am

Genuine early to mid 1964.

Comment