Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Rich on April 19, 2017 at 3:53pm

Looks slow and shaky, though I'm guessing that's a product of signing an awkward shaped item. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by TAMoore on April 19, 2017 at 3:59pm

Gotcha!

I'm glad to hear your thoughts!

Thanks!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by TAMoore on April 19, 2017 at 3:58pm

Thanks!

I really appreciate it!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Pete Bendu on April 19, 2017 at 4:01pm

This piece has a Beckett COA? Really?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by TAMoore on April 19, 2017 at 4:03pm

Hologram and certificate, apparently.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Pete Bendu on April 19, 2017 at 4:06pm

JSA Beckett I would guess, because I can't see Steve giving that a thumbs up.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by TAMoore on April 19, 2017 at 4:07pm

You might be surprised, the certificate is signed by Grad and Sobrero

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Pete Bendu on April 19, 2017 at 4:15pm

There is so much wrong with this signature that I don't even know where to begin. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rich on April 19, 2017 at 4:15pm

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by TAMoore on April 19, 2017 at 4:16pm

Yep!

That's the one!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on April 19, 2017 at 4:12pm

Doesn't have the looping Ls of Hamills. We haven't seen the COA yet. Quite honestly even if it is real its an ugly signature that I wouldn't want!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by TAMoore on April 19, 2017 at 4:15pm

Here is what they're showing me.

Haha, I like it the signature's aesthetic! I'm just curious about what this forum thinks about regarding authenticity!

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• s-l1600 (2).jpg, 258 KB

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page