RACC vs PSA Quick Opinion

I recently sent a piece to get a PSA Quick Opinion on eBay. The piece was sold by RACC trusted seller hollywood-graphs (Joshua Zollo). It came back as "Likely Not Genuine." Now, I understand that the PSA Quick Opinion may need to be even less forgiving because if they say Genuine, and you send it in and they say it's Not Genuine, then it wouldn't look great on them. Is this a case of that, should I trust RACC more than PSA, or is this truly not likely genuine? I've attached the picture, it claims to be signed by Chris Pratt, Dave Bautista, James Gunn, Sean Gunn and Pom Klementieff. Here's hollywood-graphs eBay link:

https://www.ebay.com/str/hollywoodgraphs

Any input is appreciated. Thanks!

Views: 519

Attachments: No photo uploads here

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Rick Meyer on July 11, 2018 at 5:03pm

I think it’s good. I looked at some of his other auctions too. Many would have a hard time being authenticated because they are sloppy in street graphs but that’s what you get most times. Most of his auctions are those of good signers.

i would disregard PSA quick opinion like I usually do. They probably wouldn’t get it right even if they had all week to look at it. 

Permalink Reply by FB on July 12, 2018 at 6:52pm

One time, I sent PSA a photo of a Beatles autograph. They wrote back stating it was not genuine. A year later, it was up for auction with a PSA certification.

Permalink Reply by Hwachi on July 14, 2018 at 6:19am

Ok, Thanks. Yea, I think I'm going to stop wasting my money on PSA Quick Opinions...

RSS

© 2025   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service