We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.
Any opinions if this is a real or fake auto. I'm leaning towards fake but curious to hear others input.
Tags:
I agree with you
I like it, it might be real. Just not a great signature for him.
Griffey is the one person I feel pretty comfortable with. This ball actually looks like the period he signed between his early, sloppy signature and the clean attractive signature we all know today. Forgeries tend to be one of the other. I’m actually leaning towards real on this one, probably signed in 1990-1991.
could be. It would help to know what kind of ball its on.
I don't like it. I have an IP ball I obtained at a game in 91 and it doesn't look close. My signature resembles the examples terrier posted.
Terrier, your top photo was after he “transitioned” to the signature with more flair, probably signed deep into the 1991 season. He was becoming a superstar and he needed his signature to reflect that. Your second one was signed prior, during the transition, probably late 1990, early 1991.
Here is a genuine example signed towards the end of the 1989 season. The OP photo looks somewhere between this 1989 version and your second photo.
Forgers don’t generally target the sloppy older Griffey signatures because they are less recognizable, and even the real ones draw a discerning eye (like this one is doing.) I’d put my money that the original one is good.
You make a strong case but what concerns me the lost is when you enlarge the one in the op, it really has no flow. It looks slowly drawn to me.
Again, the OP’s is not a 1989 example, so it is not going to match a 1989 signature.
It is (at least supposed to be) a signature from the period between his sloppy rookie year, and the cleaner more attractive signature of the early to mid 90s
But it does have a lot of the same characteristics, especially in “en” of Ken. Even though it doesn’t match completely, similarities can be seen in all of the letters)
Terrier, have you looked at a lot of Griffey’s early signatures? They all have that ‘unsure, slowly drawn’ personality to them. Here is a 100% genuine late 1989 Griffey right on top of the OP’s photo. You really don’t think these were done by the same hand?
I think we will have to agree to disagree on this one. I see similarities but even comparing it to the one you last posted, which does have nice flow to it, it looks slow. Look at the G to ff transition and compare the baselines. I have no doubt that you know Griffey signatures very well. I am just not comfortable with this one.
Posted by CJCollector on November 11, 2024 at 6:03pm 0 Comments 1 Like
Posted by CJCollector on November 9, 2024 at 2:32pm 7 Comments 0 Likes
Posted by CJCollector on October 30, 2024 at 3:13pm 2 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin. Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service