Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on March 17, 2021 at 8:19am

OK'd by Roger Epperson......from circa 1966.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by HangingOnTheWall on March 17, 2021 at 8:25am

Thanks, Jim.

Yes I saw that in the description ... look OK to you?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on March 17, 2021 at 8:27am

They look OK...nice & clean...you gonna bid?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by HangingOnTheWall on March 17, 2021 at 9:49am

Ah maybe ... just watching the market. Seems to be going up ...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on March 17, 2021 at 10:38am

The market for the good Beatles stuff has always held it's own. I've been a serious collector for over 35 years..(and a HUGE fan since Ed Sullivan in '64)...and the prices at auction for autographs...handwritten items...personally owned items...concert material...etc...has always been strong. The Beatles have become historical figures of 20th Century culture. You can't do much better than that!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim McFiver on March 17, 2021 at 5:25pm

The signatures look awesome. Other than missing Paul, these are winners.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by HangingOnTheWall on March 17, 2021 at 11:52pm

Thanks for your input

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Invest_In_Graphs on March 21, 2021 at 7:57pm

Lennon's "h" looks unusual, and there's no attempt at an "n". 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by HangingOnTheWall on March 22, 2021 at 12:14am

Thanks for the input. Are you suggesting it's rushed / atypical or suspect, in your view?

Cheers

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Invest_In_Graphs on March 22, 2021 at 5:13am

Suspect. I don't recall seeing one like that. Perhaps Ringo and George were in the album and someone wanted to boost it by adding John. Who knows....

• ▶ Reply