Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Vestland on September 10, 2011 at 10:41am

The page also has Linda`s signature.... it might help to show the whole page...:

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by roger epperson on September 12, 2011 at 3:26am

Back at the office and it does look fine to me too.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Vestland on September 12, 2011 at 8:38am

Thank you for your opinion Roger... But most of all, Thanks for spending your time to share your knowledge and experience with the collectors of this hobby! It`s highly appreciated!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Darren Ruskin, III on September 10, 2011 at 10:06pm

I'm sorry, but I see nothing wrong with this mccartney. Maybe other people are seeing something I am not. If everyone tells you it is bad, get back to me - I'll buy it!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on September 11, 2011 at 3:36pm

The Paul is right on esp. the extended space between the "u" and "l", which he does frequently.  the last name looks funny to me, but you seem to have a lot more experience with Mac sigs than I do, so I trust your judgement.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Chantal Paula Rosengurt on September 13, 2011 at 5:25pm

im trying to buy an MJ signature too, and as Atograph world seemed honest i asked for a quick opinion to Roger Epperson, just to be sure before i bid. But he replied to me that that´s not an MJ authentic signature. (I hope i dont offend nobody with this, this is just what happened to me). So, its really difficult to know who can you trust in...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Brick Hunter on September 14, 2011 at 8:40pm

You can get an official opinion from Roger at http://rogerepperson.com and/or a quick opinion for an auction house other than eBay from PSA/DNA at http://www.psacard.com/quickopinion/auctiondefault.aspx

 

I don't have the expertise to give opinions on these things. I know from autographworld when I looked back in their history I saw a number of higher-priced items I didn't agree with. I can't access it now but I remember a bad Gary Cooper and some others. A lot of things looked good too.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Darren Ruskin, III on September 14, 2011 at 9:07pm

i honestly don't like either one of them. Concerning the Clapton I can see it going either way with the authentication companies, they tend to get a lot right and a lot wrong on Clapton, so it's really a shot in the dark whether or not they would pass it. Jimmy Page has a lot of "thinking" going on in the signature, which is a No-no. D

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Kyle M. on September 14, 2011 at 11:03pm

The Page has a lot of thinking goin on.  Unless he was having a conversation with a hot lookin girl I'd vote NO.  I don't like the Clapton either.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Darren Ruskin, III on September 14, 2011 at 11:15pm

Agreed - Page having a conversation with a hot looking girl is definitely not out of the question - still the ladies man, he. Being distracted enough that the signature turns out looking like this? I don't think so. Definitely not the worst attempt I've ever seen by a long shot.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Darren Ruskin, III on September 14, 2011 at 9:14pm

Chris and everyone else. Roger Eperson runs a business and it's not too polite to ask so many favors of him to look at items without getting paid. I understand not shelling out more money for an opinion on an item that could potentially be bad, but if you are looking for opinions from him, psa, jsa, or the others, use their quick opinion which is accessible directly at their websites.

If you're asking us fellow collectors (that's what I thought this place was for) we can give you our opinion - if it someone we know very well. Seriously not picking on you Chris as I saw you were willing to do so, but I have seen a lot of people do it lately and that is the only reason I am saying anything.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by 029r4yc06b4rr on September 14, 2011 at 10:03pm

thanks. ill go through roger

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• Next ›
• Page