We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.
Tags:
must of signed it in rush or later years, I wouldn't buy it.
strange one. the Dimaggio looks ok but the Joe looks way off. hard to say.
That "J" is sorta freaking me out, but I would lean towards authentic.
If its cheap I would buy it or else I'll pass to be honest.
Thanks guys. I agree that the J looks atypical, but I figured it is good because the DiMaggio looks spot on. I'll skip buying it though given the mixed opinions.
Mike, I think it is authentic. but I really think there are much better signatures out there. I would not want one with the J so atypical. but that is a personal opinion. but yes, I do believe it is authentic.
Thanks Terrier. I agree, there are much better signatures to be seen yet. Just difficult finding one for a half decent price.
authentic
that is a good question. I never looked at the "i" when trying to establish authenticity. But looking at his signatures over time, it looks like the "i" disappeared for the most part in his later signatures. But if one showed up on a 90's ball, I would not automatically rule it out. There are other characteristics that are more consistent.
Posted by CJCollector on November 11, 2024 at 6:03pm 0 Comments 1 Like
Posted by CJCollector on November 9, 2024 at 2:32pm 7 Comments 0 Likes
Posted by CJCollector on October 30, 2024 at 3:13pm 2 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin. Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service