I will take a guess, and it is a guess since its your discussion. It looks like same pen. I think forgery but don't really know anything about RS sec. Copy? Hard to tell.
Charlie must have had the shakes and been signing very slowly. I agree with others, same pen and same hand
Thanks for the opinions so far. For comparison, an absolutely authentic set of Mick Taylor era Stones signatures is pictured here:
https://garyrocks.wordpress.com/2013/06/29/finally-a-mick-taylor-au...
Would have to say it doesn't look quite right and have never seen Charlie sign like this, normally a lot more narrow. Would have to maybe think this is a forgery.
There have been other questionable signatures I've seen in the last year on appointment books from the late 60's, early 70's. It wouldn't be that hard for a forger to obtain these and use these to further his/her claims of authenticity. And for JJ -- here is another example of a fully signed on one item Stones set from the Mick Taylor era. 1 of only 75 signed lithographs for the "It's Only Rock and Roll" album.
Very nice, Bruce! I didn't even know that there was such an item. Thanks for sharing!
Thanks for the opinions. I also believe that the original set is written in the same hand, and not by any of the Stones.
Check this website (scroll down):
Thanks for the link! Now we know what the signatures in question are based on. It looks like the signed card at the end is authentic?
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin. Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service