The site is slow right now. We'll be back to full speed ASAP. Our apologies.

Sgt Peppers Lp Signed By Paul

Any thoughts on this Paul signature on a Sgt Peppers Lp. Looks to be a late 90's early 2000 signature?

Views: 1227

Attachments: No photo uploads here

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on August 27, 2017 at 3:23pm

That is what I was wondering about - suppose this was a single signed LP, or as you say offered alone.

Permalink Reply by Adam Halloran on August 27, 2017 at 3:26pm
Where did you see this posted? Was it for sale? If so, how much?
Permalink Reply by fab432 on August 27, 2017 at 3:54pm
Steve, the pic was posted on a Beatles collecting site. The person asked for opinions but only posted the Paul signature. I liked it but thought I would post it here and see what the group thought? I went back to the site today and there was another post by the same individual this time just the Ringo signature. It was made to look like a different Lp. Then there was another post saying the Lp had four signatures on it. Anyway the person posting indicated it came in a job lot of Lp's that he bought and he was trying to get some opinions. Not sure what is the real story?
Permalink Reply by Adam Halloran on August 27, 2017 at 4:02pm
Well here is the story from back in June. Same person?
Attachments: No photo uploads here
Permalink Reply by fab432 on August 27, 2017 at 4:15pm
Yes that certainly sounds like the same person.
Permalink Reply by Paul on August 27, 2017 at 4:26pm
Is the listing still on facebook?
Permalink Reply by fab432 on August 27, 2017 at 4:33pm
Fab4life1973 to be exact Paul
Permalink Reply by Paul on August 27, 2017 at 4:52pm
What a waste of time , this has been. Moving along.
Permalink Reply by Adam Halloran on August 27, 2017 at 5:01pm
It at least shows that both information and the whole piece of the item needs inspection. Also shows that quick reviews online aren't enough sometimes.

This info wouldn't be missed when inspected in person. Also I think research does need to be made on some pieces (where it came from...lineage...etc.) to show if items came from a reputable site or person.

Too much trickery involved, not saying from this thread, but the owner REALLY wishes for one to be deemed authentic, Sadly he is going on fb pages where these collectors just don't know what to look for...

I am no expert, but the piece as a whole tells the true story.
Permalink Reply by fab432 on August 27, 2017 at 5:06pm
For some maybe. However I certainly learned something and I'm thankful for the input. I guess it's all a matter of perspective.
Permalink Reply by Paul on August 27, 2017 at 5:07pm
Ok you have won me over!
Great points Adam, research def!!
Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on August 27, 2017 at 6:12pm

I like all the comments and suggestions here. Here's what I learned or was confirmed from this discussion:

  1. Always see the entire piece, especially before you say you think an autograph is genuine.

  2. Look at exemplars regularly!

  3. Unless an autograph is clearly, no question fake, look at it at least a couple of times before giving an opinion. Go back to it a while later and then comment.

  4. This is the most important thing, and what's I feel is missing from most TPAs: Have more than one person who knows the subject's autograph look at the piece! That would greatly reduce errors by reputable TPAs. It should be mandatory.

  5. I think that seeing an autograph in person is mostly to confirm authenticity. The vast majority of forgeries can be determined from a good image.

RSS

Sign up for our Newsletter!

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2026   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service