We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Rolling Stones

Hi guys, what do you think of these early Stones signatures?

Thanks

0 members like this

Attachments: No photo uploads here

rolling stones.jpg, 658 KB

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on July 2, 2019 at 2:15pm

I don't know Wyman's secretarials well enough to definitively comment. Hopefully others do.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Samuel Mumenthaler on July 2, 2019 at 1:04pm

What about these, that are most probably from the same source:

https://www.the-saleroom.com/en-gb/auction-catalogues/fieldings-auc...

Remember: These are 1963 sigs (as described) and written very early in the Stones career.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by nicholas pansini on July 2, 2019 at 1:13pm

Sam, I don't care what year they were signed, they are bad forgeries! They in no way, shape or form they match those authenic by the Stones. If you or anybody doesn't believe me, check in the upper right box where it says: "Search Autograph Live" and you could enter any one of their names and then examine their signatures, it's that simple. I have used this method as a way of authenticating mine and it worked. Unless we are all looking at a different autograph, these above are FAKE!

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Samuel Mumenthaler on July 2, 2019 at 1:30pm

A 1963 set, signed at the Cavern Liverpool, Nov. 1963

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on July 2, 2019 at 1:33pm

I was just reading in these early days Richard's signature ended with an upstroke as here and the OP. Most useful scan in this context, thanks for posting.