We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks. 

Hi guys, what do you think of these early Stones signatures?

Thanks

Views: 2372

Attachments: No photo uploads here

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Joe is real. 100%.

Why do you think they're real, Mr. Mojo? I think they are very likely forgeries, but others know the Stones better than I do.

That's what I was thinking they're wyman sets. Has this revelation effected the market?

Not sure which set we are discussing now.

Are you referring to the set in the OP, or the set posted by Joe W ?  Or do you believe that both sets are Wyman's? 

I think that the Jagger and Richards in the one in the OP are not authentic (Wyman?); and I don't think that any signatures in the one that Joe W posted are real. 

All signatures of stones i  this discussion are real.

I'd be happy to see an example of those legendary "Wyman sets". Can you help us out with an example? This would be very helpful.

Here, page 2 etc...unless I misread they are Wyman sets posted by Mojo. Roger gives an opinion as well.

Wyman for all

Unless I misunderstood this is a set posted by Mojo and identified as a set by Wyman in the thread I linked.

This is not letting me post the pic - it is the set above the set in green in the thread linked I was trying to show. There are several Wyman sets there.

And why do you think they are fake? The signatures changes over the years... these are all signatures of the Stones in 1963. 

The signatures changes over tbe years... stop!

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service