We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks.
Authenticity is Everything
Urgent Metallica early sigs with inscription !
Hi,
need urgent help on this one, beckett said will not pass / unlikely to pass full authentication
I am about to ship funds for this item and it will be MOST important item in my collection
Can anyone help me out and confirm this is legit please!
some folks also said this is fake so idk
ty
- Attachments: No photo uploads here
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on
-
Why not post the rest as you did the two Lars?
-
Permalink Reply by Slobodan Milosavljevic on
-
Provided photo from Steve is not good to compare Cliff so ill use other one same i found
here u go
And 2nd photo is Kirk compared from Steve reference photo just thought i posted in previous post
-
-
Again, so very different :( Any other opinions out there?
-
-
-
Eric Keith:
I am trying to figure out as well, what we have learned that promo photo is more sloppy and not good as kill em all right?
They had to sign 100 of promo photos i guess all at once so i understand sigs are not that great/clean.
if its true that kill em all is signed for someone special (with added inscription) and they were sobber than make sense why kill em all look slightly differed idk my 0.02c
-
-
Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on
-
Slobodan,
Whatever you want to do is fine. I told you I was sure that the autographs aren’t real. But I am not a professional authenticator.
-
-
+1 to marc e
-
-
+1 nothing beats an in hand examination.
-
Permalink Reply by Bjorn VDB on
-
I’m almost sure the signatures in the opening posts are not done in the same hand. If so, this would be the forgery of the century.
-
-
I still see this as a problem item, Slobodan. There seems to be opinions and rationale, but the ink just doesn't look its age or written by the band, IMHO (I claim no special Metallica knowledge). More exemplars from 1983?
-
-
052B5B49-A763-4EB1-B747-449E6FD0B198.jpeg
Here is two more i manage to find from 1983(blue is for sure 1983) regular one might be 1984/ early 85
61ECACBD-66AC-425B-A657-D5385604E2DF.jpeg
3rd one
-
-
Sorry, I don't see these supporting the signatures in question, which seem oddly legible in this small comparison. Any "best case" scenarios make me nervous - this seems fresh and odd. Others?
-
-
I would not use any of those three as examples of genuine Metallica autographs.
Photos
Videos
Groups
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
