Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on November 28, 2019 at 1:46pm

Why not post the rest as you did the two Lars?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Slobodan Milosavljevic on November 28, 2019 at 2:25pm

Provided photo from Steve is not good to compare Cliff so ill use other one same i found 

here u go

And 2nd photo is Kirk compared from Steve reference photo just thought i posted in previous post

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on November 28, 2019 at 2:39pm

Again, so very different :( Any other opinions out there?

Permalink Reply by Slobodan Milosavljevic on November 28, 2019 at 3:19pm

Eric Keith:

I am trying to figure out as well, what we have learned that promo photo is more sloppy and not good as kill em all right?

They had to sign 100 of promo photos i guess all at once so i understand sigs are not that great/clean.

if its true that kill em all is signed for someone special (with added inscription) and they were sobber than make sense why kill em all look slightly differed idk my 0.02c 

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on November 27, 2019 at 12:37pm

Slobodan,

 Whatever you want to do is fine. I told you I was sure that the autographs aren’t real. But I am not a professional authenticator. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on November 27, 2019 at 6:10am

+1 to marc e

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on November 27, 2019 at 2:19pm

+1 nothing beats an in hand examination.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bjorn VDB on November 27, 2019 at 12:45pm

I’m almost sure the signatures in the opening posts are not done in the same hand. If so, this would be the forgery of the century. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on November 28, 2019 at 3:35pm

I still see this as a problem item, Slobodan. There seems to be opinions and rationale, but the ink just doesn't look its age or written by the band, IMHO (I claim no special Metallica knowledge). More exemplars from 1983?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Slobodan Milosavljevic on November 28, 2019 at 6:00pm

052B5B49-A763-4EB1-B747-449E6FD0B198.jpeg

Here is two more i manage to find from 1983(blue is for sure 1983) regular one might be 1984/ early 85

61ECACBD-66AC-425B-A657-D5385604E2DF.jpeg

3rd one

74FDDD38-FA29-4791-B1C9-5F3CCB7E7B66.jpeg

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on November 28, 2019 at 6:05pm

Sorry, I don't see these supporting the signatures in question, which seem oddly legible in this small comparison. Any "best case" scenarios make me nervous - this seems fresh and odd. Others?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on November 28, 2019 at 6:16pm

I would not use any of those three as examples of genuine Metallica autographs. 

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• …
• 8
• Next ›
• Page