Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Mr Mojo Risin on October 29, 2020 at 6:46am

yes, but a forger cannot also falsify the signatures of Cat Stevens, the Move and other artists' signatures in the same tour with Hendrix or make perfect signatures of Noel Redding and Mitch ... or even falsify the signatures of other famous artists in an autograph book, artists that maybe one has collected because he worked in a place for concerts. this you do not understand. Not all Hendrixes are fake ...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mr Mojo Risin on October 29, 2020 at 6:47am

yes, but a forger cannot also falsify the signatures of Cat Stevens, the Move and other artists' signatures in the same tour with Hendrix or make perfect signatures of Noel Redding and Mitch ... or even falsify the signatures of other famous artists in an autograph book, artists that maybe one has collected because he worked in a place for concerts. this you do not understand. Not all Hendrixes are fake ...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mr Mojo Risin on October 29, 2020 at 6:47am

The Cat Stevens signature is extremely rare to find... 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mr Mojo Risin on October 29, 2020 at 6:50am

Also the signature of Beatles in 1964 and 1963 never ending in the market... are all fakes?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mr Mojo Risin on October 29, 2020 at 7:12am

if keithspoon explains to me or how a forger manages to perfectly falsify all the signatures and how rare in a real autograph book or how a forger manages to find an autograph book full of signatures much rarer than Hendrix's and then add Hendrix's own one .

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bruce Juice on October 29, 2020 at 9:15am

You clearly don't understand what Keithspoon is saying. People find or buy an autograph book with authentic signatures in it -- and then ADD a fake Jimi Hendrix. So the forger does not have to know how to forge the others. Old autograph books are for sale all the time at auction houses all over the world. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mr Mojo Risin on October 29, 2020 at 11:28am

No it not correct... 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mr Mojo Risin on October 29, 2020 at 11:30am

But if the Cat stevens signature is more rare of Hendrix... incredible...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Keithspoon1978 on October 29, 2020 at 9:06am

It’s because the other signatures are worth very little money I mean who collects Cat Stevens or “The Move” you can probably count the collectors  on one hand, add a Hendrix signature and then it’s worth money.

Museum’s have antiques and paintings in their gallery’s what are a hundred years or more old and some experts believe 30 to 40 percent cent are fakes especially the paintings people were faking stuff a hundreds years ago nothing different to today.

Dealers will keep dealing in them for the money, it’s supply and demand.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on October 29, 2020 at 9:39am

Old forged paintings no longer pass x -ray spectography, neutron activation radiography and pigment analysis.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Keithspoon1978 on October 29, 2020 at 10:21am

Well it didn’t help them the $450,0000 fake.

http://artwatch.org.uk/the-louvre-museums-bizarre-charge-of-fake-in...

X-Ray paintings they can and have done for years but they can only tell so much there is always a way around that.

It’s like those dodgy autograph examiners with there COA’s “we test it for DNA and it’s been looked at and decided in a court of law” 

load of crap

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mr Mojo Risin on October 29, 2020 at 12:06pm

That is practically an autograph collector or fans of the time, he had all the autographs of the artists on tour with hendrix signed but did not want Hendrix's signature? Then comes the forger who adds Hendrix's signature to top it all off. But are you out?

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• Next ›
• Page