We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks. 

Hi

I am looking at a Clint Eastwood signed contract from 1966.

The seller wont make a refund, if it cant be authenticated. Which is a red flag for me.

What are your opinions.

Best Regards

Troels

Views: 686

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

"...in January 1966, Eastwood met producer Dino De Laurentiis in New York City and agreed to star in a non-Western five-part anthology production, The Witches (Le Streghe, 1967), opposite De Laurentiis's wife, Silvana Mangano.[84] Eastwood's 19-minute installment took only a few days to shoot, but his performance did not please critics; one wrote, "no other performance of his is quite so 'un-Clintlike'..."

Authenticity aside it lacks eye appeal IMO.

Thanks Eric

Fun to get the story behind one of Clint Eastwoods less impressive works.

I agree it is not the most breathtaking Clint Eastwood autographs:)

But it is an quite early autograph. 

Best Regards 

Troels 

Looking at Google images his signed documents look quite consistent. Yours, however, looks different to all these. If you purchased from eBay within the last 30 days you can open a case built on photos of these other documents and if they won't accept a return, eBay will step in and make a decision. I'm sure they will give you any benefit of doubt.

If you purchased elsewhere, it may be more difficult.

Hi Mikex

I have not bought yet. Thanks for your input.

Best Regards

Troels

  1. There is also a possibility of it being a copy. By the way, who is selling it?
  2. I'm always wary when sellers don't offer refunds

It's also a low-quality JPG, which is often a warning sign. If the seller can't give you a large, sharp image don't consider it no matter how good it looks.

+1

To be honest it does look like a photocopy. The signature is the same colour as the document and the signature looks uneven even though it was signed with a biro. 

Troels, First things first….the seller won't make a refund….don't buy it. Second I own a 1963 Clint, not to mention all the early Eastwoods look nothing like this……run away from this contract…In my humble opinion.

Not Authentic in my Opinion.

I think it comes with an LOA  but stay away from this! 

[Edited]

You mentioned the name that must not be mentioned on this site.

I do not understand...

I didn't give my opinion because of the LOA, but because of the Signature.
Its strange that one is not allowed to mention which questionable TPA it is.

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service