Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on December 21, 2021 at 12:56pm

"...in January 1966, Eastwood met producer Dino De Laurentiis in New York City and agreed to star in a non-Western five-part anthology production, The Witches (Le Streghe, 1967), opposite De Laurentiis's wife, Silvana Mangano.^[84] Eastwood's 19-minute installment took only a few days to shoot, but his performance did not please critics; one wrote, "no other performance of his is quite so 'un-Clintlike'..."

Authenticity aside it lacks eye appeal IMO.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Troels on December 21, 2021 at 1:18pm

Thanks Eric

Fun to get the story behind one of Clint Eastwoods less impressive works.

I agree it is not the most breathtaking Clint Eastwood autographs:)

But it is an quite early autograph. 

Best Regards 

Troels 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mikex on December 21, 2021 at 1:16pm

Looking at Google images his signed documents look quite consistent. Yours, however, looks different to all these. If you purchased from eBay within the last 30 days you can open a case built on photos of these other documents and if they won't accept a return, eBay will step in and make a decision. I'm sure they will give you any benefit of doubt.

If you purchased elsewhere, it may be more difficult.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Troels on December 21, 2021 at 1:24pm

Hi Mikex

I have not bought yet. Thanks for your input.

Best Regards

Troels

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mikex on December 21, 2021 at 1:31pm

1. There is also a possibility of it being a copy. By the way, who is selling it?
2. I'm always wary when sellers don't offer refunds

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on December 21, 2021 at 1:31pm

It's also a low-quality JPG, which is often a warning sign. If the seller can't give you a large, sharp image don't consider it no matter how good it looks.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on December 21, 2021 at 1:33pm

+1

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mikex on December 21, 2021 at 2:10pm

To be honest it does look like a photocopy. The signature is the same colour as the document and the signature looks uneven even though it was signed with a biro. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by David Lewis on December 21, 2021 at 3:19pm

Troels, First things first….the seller won't make a refund….don't buy it. Second I own a 1963 Clint, not to mention all the early Eastwoods look nothing like this……run away from this contract…In my humble opinion.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ivo on December 21, 2021 at 3:25pm

Not Authentic in my Opinion.

I think it comes with an LOA  but stay away from this! 

[Edited]

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Nick Dimeo on December 21, 2021 at 3:45pm

You mentioned the name that must not be mentioned on this site.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ivo on December 22, 2021 at 1:49am

I do not understand...

I didn't give my opinion because of the LOA, but because of the Signature.
Its strange that one is not allowed to mention which questionable TPA it is.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page