Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on February 10, 2022 at 10:11am

It looks ok to me.

Here is one of mine for comparison.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by RobTwoRs on February 10, 2022 at 10:41am

Lovely example, item Richard 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on February 10, 2022 at 10:15am

Not for me - very poor contrast. Pass even before authenticity comes into play. Oversized 11x14 likely a copy photo. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by RobTwoRs on February 10, 2022 at 10:39am

Thanks for your comments guys, 50/50 so far. Let's see what others chime in and think... 

Thank you :)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on February 10, 2022 at 10:48am

Remember there is such a thing as "authentic but undesirable". Even if genuine you won't seee this 3 feet away - bad contrast, cheap copy photo. Pass.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joe W. on February 10, 2022 at 10:57am

This is likely authentic, IMO.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by RobTwoRs on February 10, 2022 at 11:01am

Thanks for your input Joe much appreciated :)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on February 10, 2022 at 11:08am

Just remember the contrast. From 3 feet away on a wall you'll only see part of a J. I'd not pay full price for this somewhat contrast challenged over-enlarged copy photo. It's 11xx14 to make the most $ possible (quality be darned).

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by RobTwoRs on February 10, 2022 at 11:47am

Thanks Eric for your input appreciated :) 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on February 10, 2022 at 12:09pm

Anytime RobTwoRs.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on February 10, 2022 at 8:38pm

Rob2Rs, that Nicholson concerns me. The letter shapes, the J most prominently, the entire signature is too smooth and flowing. Richard Booth's looks right on, and here's mine.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by RobTwoRs on February 12, 2022 at 9:34am

Lovely Item Steve thanks for your input etc. 

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page