Thoughts?

Thanks!

Views: 562

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Not authentic IMO. 

Ballroom,

I spent at least 10 minutes on this and was about to post that I thought it was LLO—likely lousy real—until I saw your opinion that you didn't like it. If you and I disagree on one of your specialties I always check my work. You're usually right.

OK, OK...almost always right.

I'm still pretty sure it's real, even tho it has some characteristics that are warning signs.

The "love" looks solid to me. 

I don't study Linda much but I spent time on her autograph in this set and I think it's in range.

Paul took a ton of work. It's as atypical as a Republican that loves Biden. But I tore it apart piece by piece and I think it checks out.

Thanks for the kind words, Steve. I believe it’s a forgery style that we’ve seen before, and from the same source as FB’s previous post. The forger has included Linda’s signature on other items. Here’s another example for comparison:

That "u" and that "l" - same forger I think.

Yes, and if you look closely, it appears that the forger may have accidentally included three “C”s? It looks very odd.

I don't see similar characteristics to the one you posted in the one in the OP, Ballroom. Perhaps this is one that looks so off that someone sold it to the dealer as fake. Do you have more examples of forgeries by the seller that you can post to compare it to?

I dont have my exemplars at the moment, but i’ll post more when I get a chance. FB just posted a George Harrison that I believe is from the same forger as this Macca. Most of the exemplars I have are from Chaucer Auctions.

The third and fourth ones tell me you're right.

Bad forgery 

Thanks, guys!

I think this is an on-the-fly Macca.

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service