Hello All:

I know authenticating is a tricky business (and Roger may have even participated in discussions on this site at one point) but is it just me or is he FAR less reliable than PSA, Beckett, and JSA? This would encompass not only Beatles but all historical and musician autographs. They all of course make mistakes but Epperson seems to pre-certify a high percentage of non genuine. I was browsing RR auctions and they seem to rely on him for a lot of pre-authentications but so much is obviously not authentic it is a shame. Meanwhile all of the Tracks, Beckett, PSA and JSA look fine.  I am not an authenticator but even my not-so-professional eye can easily spy the abundance of items on RR that only are pre-certified by Epperson and are not genuine.

He must have a niche but I do not know what it is.

Views: 1177

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I think the Beatles ones you linked are good. 

Any particular message rick? Is that the $300 certificate?

I think so, and I'll leave it to you to decide whether RR is trustworthy or not.
https://www.rrauction.com/auctions/lot-detail/34352220593575-beatles/

Very good example of a questionable $300 cert from Epperson.

Yes, you don't get a lot of bang for your buck. Basically the auction description/image and a signature.

Ultimately, as with any authentication, it is a case by case situation IMO. Broad statements about COA's are more fitting for a concern GFA, and that is certainly not Roger.

GFA?

Global Forensics ("Wrong the whole world over") - perhaps I have the acronym incorrect.

I think you’re referring to Guaranteed Forensic Authenticators.

Global Authentics. I got the letters wrong. Neither is a place to drop any change.

RSS

© 2025   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service