Authenticity is Everything
Suspicious Wings era autographs
Perhaps I am too suspicious but over the last months a lot of Wings era autographs on scruffy paper appeared in several facebook groups. All with the "is this genuine?"-tag. Is someone producing them at home or could these all be good? I wonder as these type or autographs haven't come up for years and the figure of those similar scruffy ones is very strange. I fear they all base on authentic examples (as Paul signed as such mid 70s).
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on
-
Thorston, this is an important discussion. Thanks for posting it. They do not look good to me but I don't want to point out my tells, at least not publicly.
-
Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on
-
these are highly suspicious
-
Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on
-
Suspicious for sure.
-
Permalink Reply by X Karl on
-
I asked Roger Epperson for opinion on the red ink one at the down right Corner before placed a bid on it. He thought it is genuine. It was sold for 810 dollars and I didn't win the bid though.
-
Permalink Reply by Thorsten Knublauch To X Karl on
-
This red one is a fake IMO for several reasons.
The problem for all fans, experts and so called experts is - if you see one autograph you easily will say "authentic" - if more come up in a short space of time you get suscpicious. That's the reason fr my post. Some above could be good - but I assume at least half of them arent.
We had this quite often in the past. When one Paul signed Beatles album appeared a few years back all agreed it is good and the first ones got a COA from Frank. Then dozens more in a 1:1 authentic style appear and we now all agree that there are all fake.
Same goes for a certain Ringo autograph that appears to be a autopen (from a faker not Ringo) based on an authentic example.
© 2025 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
