Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on February 17, 2014 at 1:42pm

the Harrison is really strange

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on February 17, 2014 at 2:21pm

Authentic, in my opinion. Wilfrid Brambell is on there as well.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on February 17, 2014 at 3:24pm

Man, that set's odd but I think it could be good. Much larger pics are needed, though.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Micko on February 17, 2014 at 3:43pm

I'm familiar with Wilfrid Brambell and that looks legit.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on February 17, 2014 at 3:57pm

The Ringo looks okay, but strange elements of the other three, especially Harrison and McCartney.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on February 17, 2014 at 4:11pm

To me...it looks ok...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on February 17, 2014 at 4:24pm

I can't really see the Mc or the Lennon, but the harrison is way off. The lennon, from what I can see, looks ok.  

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on February 17, 2014 at 4:47pm

What is it about the George signature that looks off to you?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on February 17, 2014 at 5:01pm

The abnormally large o and e. The arris in Harrison. It' just looks all wrong. I don't see anything about it that looks authentic.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on February 17, 2014 at 4:56pm

Here's another set from the filming of AHDN:

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on February 17, 2014 at 5:40pm

if this george were all by itself, what would you think of it?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on February 17, 2014 at 5:59pm

It's too late to look at it all by itself, but aside from slightly larger than normal "o", does it appear to be in a different hand than this one from '64?

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page