Rolling Stones Autographs. Authentic?

Hello everyone,

I'm new around here, i have some doubts and all help is welcome.

Recently bought this Charlie Watts, and now have the chance to buy the Mick Jagger.

What is your idea about these?

Thanks.

0 members like this

Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on December 9, 2014 at 10:23am

The Charlie Watts is authentic and signed TTM.

The Jagger could be ok, but not 100% sure on that.

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on December 9, 2014 at 10:31am

"Mick" is a little unusual.

Permalink Reply by Full Time Flipper on December 9, 2014 at 10:38am

the mick is decent ish but the jagger looks all wrong especially the gg, charlie looks ok to me

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on December 9, 2014 at 3:05pm

Sorry, "Mick" meaning Mick Jagger.

Permalink Reply by Dan Gregory on December 9, 2014 at 1:22pm

Charlie is real, do not like the Mick

Permalink Reply by Bjarne Soderholm on December 9, 2014 at 5:24pm

I have to agree with the other and say yes to Charlie and no to Mick.

Permalink Reply by Mick Jagger on December 9, 2014 at 7:02pm

Charlie looks Ok. But Mick Jagger looks unusual for me.

Permalink Reply by Rikneves on December 10, 2014 at 8:42am

I am very pleased Charlie is good, it was my idea, I had seen similar TTM.

Mick also leave me doubts, I'll pass.

Thanks for your opinions.

I just found on ebay this guy (autographking47) selling this crap.

does anyone believe this?

Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on December 10, 2014 at 7:04pm

Charlie is good .

Welcome to
Autograph Live

Sign Up
or Sign In

We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.