Rolling Stones Autographs. Authentic?

Hello everyone,
I'm new around here, i have some doubts and all help is welcome.
Recently bought this Charlie Watts, and now have the chance to buy the Mick Jagger.
What is your idea about these?
Thanks.

Views: 646

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on December 9, 2014 at 10:23am
The Charlie Watts is authentic and signed TTM.

The Jagger could be ok, but not 100% sure on that.
Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on December 9, 2014 at 10:31am

"Mick" is a little unusual.

Permalink Reply by Full Time Flipper on December 9, 2014 at 10:38am

  the mick is decent ish but the jagger looks all wrong especially the gg, charlie looks ok to me

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on December 9, 2014 at 3:05pm

Sorry, "Mick" meaning Mick Jagger.

Permalink Reply by Dan Gregory on December 9, 2014 at 1:22pm

Charlie is real, do not like the Mick

Permalink Reply by Bjarne Soderholm on December 9, 2014 at 5:24pm

I have to agree with the other and say yes to Charlie and no to Mick.

Permalink Reply by Mick Jagger on December 9, 2014 at 7:02pm
Charlie looks Ok. But Mick Jagger looks unusual for me.
Permalink Reply by Rikneves on December 10, 2014 at 8:42am
I am very pleased Charlie is good, it was my idea, I had seen similar TTM.
Mick also leave me doubts, I'll pass.
Thanks for your opinions.
I just found on ebay this guy (autographking47) selling this crap.
does anyone believe this?
Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on December 10, 2014 at 7:04pm
Charlie is good .

RSS

© 2025   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service