Paul McCartney & Mick Jagger Signed photos. Thoughts on each?

Views: 329

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by James on May 4, 2015 at 2:49pm
I like Mick's autograph, but I'm not sure about Paul's. I have some issues with the P and the l. But that could be related to the squeezed space he was trying to sign in.
Permalink Reply by JJ on May 4, 2015 at 6:31pm

My concern about the McCartney is that it looks like a newer photo and I've noticed that these days he's barely signing Paul, let alone his last name.

Permalink Reply by FB on May 4, 2015 at 8:14pm

To be fair, the McCartney photo looks like it might have come from the mid-2000's or later.

Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on May 4, 2015 at 9:45pm
I think they both look good.
Permalink Reply by Edward Siebert on May 4, 2015 at 10:13pm
Both are authentic, IMO.
For Paul's, I have seen the P like that many times, and think it all looks good overall, certainly his standard sloppy last name that he does now (if he does it at all). And the Mick is great.
Permalink Reply by John Carpenter on May 5, 2015 at 5:26am

thanks for the feedback everyone

RSS

© 2025   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service