Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Lou reves on April 5, 2011 at 8:00am

Greg I dont know anything about Jackie's signature, could you tell me what makes this no good?

Thanks!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by mc on April 5, 2011 at 8:22am

hi greg,in my opinion your amongst the best hendrix autograph expert in the world,along with roger epperson and all the great authenticators.

I will always seek your advice on any autograph i might buy,including hendrix

ps,do you have pictures of the hendrix autographs you bought in the 70s from creem magazine,please try your best to find some more early sabbath examples,please

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by mc on April 5, 2011 at 8:03am

hi greg,i actually use several opinion services,psa/dna,ama,roger epperson,al wittnebert,sometimes paas,jeff gold,and dealers such as tracks uk,markus brandes,is it real,

then there is you and other on this forum,the more opinions the better

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Lou reves on April 5, 2011 at 3:48pm

Are you saying PSA/DNA is as bad as they say?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Kyle M. on April 6, 2011 at 11:55pm

Gleason might be just as rare as McQueen from what some collectors say.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by E.B.G. on April 7, 2011 at 12:11am

Why are these mail sigs being authenticated?  Ive heard from a long time collector that Gleason was not very friendly. He wouldn't even rehearse with the other actors.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on August 12, 2011 at 2:36pm

Gleason and McQueen on the same photo. Amazing...where did it come from?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by CEE GEE on August 13, 2011 at 5:23am

Gleason/Mcqueen Currently up for auction for 4 K

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on August 13, 2011 at 4:28pm

Thanks, CeeGee...where? I'm interested in it.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by DB on April 7, 2011 at 4:49am

Define bad and they.  IT's painfully obvious that they 1. Make some mistakes but more bothersome 2. Are too arrogant to correct them when there is empirical evidence to the contrary.  The latter is the part that is more troubling than anything from my perspective.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by DB on April 7, 2011 at 4:43am

Right or Wrong thread and until we have a better mousetrap that someone builds...

 

Didn't we have a gleason thread around here?  We ought to link them in...

 

and this is AN ORIGINAL Gleason signature.  The rest of them are all up for debate ;-)

 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rich on April 7, 2011 at 9:39pm

I know this thread has become more about Gleason than PSA/DNA, but I just wanted to note my one experience with them in the past.  To be honest, I've never been a big fan.  Well, I was at a Mounted Memories show afew weeks back, and there they were, charging $8 to slap that sticker on everyone's stuff.  At first I figured I wouldn't need it.  Then I realized that it was really the "rule" for authentication that weekend (I'd been hoping you could get the individual athlete's hologram or at least an MM holo).  So I gave in, figuring it might be worth it should I ever re-sell it.  That show was March 13.  They STILL haven't loaded my COA's in the system.  From what I've heard, they haven't loaded a lot of people's COA's.  In fact, I'm not sure they loaded anyone's COA's!  Good God.  After paying $8 for them to do essentially nothing, they still couldn't hack it!

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• …
• 12
• Next ›
• Page