Hi
I need your help for this JH signed .
what do you think.
Gracias

Views: 1314

Attachments: No photo uploads here

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

That's A-OK Marcelo,

Just because I run this site doesn't mean I'm right. Ballroom is much better than me on Hendrix autographs. I'm just sharing my concerns.

Yes I understand you.
Your opinion means a lot to me so I listen to you attentively .
Thank you for your attention to this topic .

Hang on. I should have some more info later on.

my immediate thoughts are not good the Jimi looks good but the Hendrix looks off the n and d look like those fake signed lps from a while ago but lately there have been some slightly odd Hendrix getting authenticated this one from RR (pic attatched) would have drawn a lot of concerns a while back and doesnt immediately look authentic   but is 

wait for ballroom

Attachments: No photo uploads here
I hope that we can prove or disprove its authenticity but I am eager and curious by this
Thank you Rogers for your photo and response .

The Hendrix expert says that it's good, and I highly value his opinion. I believe that he is correct. I'll try to put some comparison images together a little later.

Nice work  

Thank you to you and your expert.
I appreciate your help enormously . I expected the comparison photos with impatience .

Here's a similar "Jimi" from RR Auction. The loop at the beginning of the "M" in the other example is correct.

This one shows similar characteristics:

I'm enjoying looking at these. I thought the first one was fine to start with.

Similar vertical connection from the "D to the R:

Very great finds !!
Indeed all these characteristics are presented in the model that I showed you this is reassuring.
Good works ballroomday67 !

RSS

© 2025   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service