Authenticity is Everything

BallroomDays67's Discussions (8,435)

View

Discussions Replied To (8199)	Replies	Latest Activity
"Ah, okay. The other one isn’t authentic either, IMO." BallroomDays67 replied Aug 24, 2019 to Paul Mccartney and Denny laine, opinions please	9	Aug 24, 2019 Reply by Ru007
"May I ask why you chose that one? I’m just curious, as the listing ended a few days…" BallroomDays67 replied Aug 24, 2019 to Paul Mccartney and Denny laine, opinions please	9	Aug 24, 2019 Reply by Ru007
"I agree that it isn’t authentic. I believe it’s from the same source as the Ringos f…" BallroomDays67 replied Aug 24, 2019 to Paul Mccartney and Denny laine, opinions please	9	Aug 24, 2019 Reply by Ru007
"In looking at the signature in total, I think it's real. Here's a CD that someone re…" BallroomDays67 replied Aug 23, 2019 to Paul McCartney signed magazine	54	Aug 24, 2019 Reply by Jim Cushman
"What do you think about the "AR" portion of this one? " BallroomDays67 replied Aug 23, 2019 to Paul McCartney signed magazine	54	Aug 24, 2019 Reply by Jim Cushman
"An edition of 750 isn’t rare." BallroomDays67 replied Aug 22, 2019 to What constitutes a “rare” book?	45	Aug 24, 2019 Reply by Judge Nutmeg
"It's signed by the band as well. " BallroomDays67 replied Aug 22, 2019 to Paul McCartney signed magazine	54	Aug 24, 2019 Reply by Jim Cushman
"Here's a PSA/DNA authenticated example from 1993. " BallroomDays67 replied Aug 22, 2019 to Paul McCartney signed magazine	54	Aug 24, 2019 Reply by Jim Cushman
"I agree. Not authentic, in my opinion." BallroomDays67 replied Aug 22, 2019 to removed	4	Aug 22, 2019 Reply by Bruce Juice
"I would also say likely genuine." BallroomDays67 replied Aug 22, 2019 to Paul McCartney signed magazine	54	Aug 24, 2019 Reply by Jim Cushman