Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on October 22, 2015 at 2:26pm

The signature is a disaster, but the auction description is priceless.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by JackGotLucky on October 22, 2015 at 2:40pm

What's really funny Ballroom is that 2 of the 3 exemplars he posted for his "authenticity" comparisons are also forgeries.           Jack..

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on October 22, 2015 at 2:35pm

Not real at all. Terrible

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on October 22, 2015 at 4:52pm

Wow!! Gotta have this one!!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on October 22, 2015 at 7:40pm

They didn't have Marker back then which could stick to guitars? Is that correct ?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve on October 24, 2015 at 12:56pm

That is what I was thinking.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joe Alesi on October 27, 2015 at 1:34am

Seller states" "I personally showed this exact guitar to Ray Manzarek in 2009 in Reno,Nv (pictures on request) and he thought it was beautiful."  Via Ebay I just asked him why he didn't have Manzarek sign it when he had the chance with a photo of him signing it. At least one signature could be reliably authentic. And Manzarek thought the guitar was beautiful?!? That's all he said? I wonder if that was that before or after "Morrison" was added to it. If I get an interesting response I'll post it here.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve on October 29, 2015 at 9:47am

Of course, the guy was carrying around his supposed signed Morrison guitar, no worries there. He probably showed manzarek an unsigned guitar and was told it was beautiful. I guess someone can just mash together different parts of different stories and create a whole new one.

• ▶ Reply